GMAC v. Morris Horne


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:07-cv-00515-REP,3:07-cv-00538-REP,3:08-cv-00123-REP,3:07-cv-00755-REP,3:08-cv-00151-REP,3:07-cv-00732-REP,3:07-cv-00719-REP,BK-06-33159-DOT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998416220] [08-1848, 08-1850]

Download PDF
GMAC v. Morris Horne Doc. 0 Case: 08-1848 Document: 31 Date Filed: 09/01/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1848 GMAC, Plaintiff - Appellant, and CITIFINANCIAL AUTO CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MORRIS DWAYNE HORNE; AARON LA VIGNE; AMANDA LA VIGNE, Defendants Appellees, and AMY LILLIAN TAYLOR, Defendant. No. 08-1850 GMAC; CITIFINANCIAL AUTO CORPORATION, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. MORRIS DWAYNE HORNE; AARON LA VIGNE; AMANDA LA VIGNE, Defendants Appellants, and Case: 08-1848 Document: 31 Date Filed: 09/01/2010 Page: 2 AMY LILLIAN TAYLOR, Defendant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00515-REP) Submitted: August 20, 2010 Decided: September 1, 2010 Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Katherine M. Sutcliffe Becker, Barkley Clark, STINSON, MORRISON & HECKER, LLP, Washington, D.C., for GMAC. James Michael Flaherty, BOLEMAN LAW FIRM, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Mark Clifton Leffler, BOLEMAN LAW FIRM, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Morris Dwayne Horne, Aaron La Vigne, and Amanda La Vigne. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Case: 08-1848 Document: 31 Date Filed: 09/01/2010 Page: 3 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, the parties appeal from the district court's order affirming in part and reversing in part the bankruptcy courts' orders finding that a portion of GMAC's claims in the underlying bankruptcy proceedings are unsecured. 618 (4th In light of our decision in In re Price, 562 F.3d Cir. 2009) (holding debtor's negative equity in a trade-in vehicle included in amount financed created a purchase money obligation within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. 1325(a)(2006), we summarily affirm the portion of the district court's order at issue in No. 08-1850. Because the parties have settled the remaining issues by filing an amended plan in the bankruptcy court, we dismiss No. 08-1848 as moot. we deny GMAC's motion to retain jurisdiction. oral argument because in the the facts and legal before Accordingly, We dispense with contentions the court are and adequately presented materials argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?