Roman Tiffer v. Worker's Compensation

Filing 920081024

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1852

ROMAN TIFFER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WORKER=S COMPENSATION; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CORPORATION; ABACUS CORPORATION; THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:08cv-01417-JFM) Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 24, 2008

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roman Tiffer, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Roman Tiffer appeals the district court=s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. '

1915(e)(2)(B) (2000).

In his informal appellate brief, Tiffer does

not address the district court=s ruling that he failed to allege facts setting forth a claim cognizable in federal court. * See

Therefore, Tiffer has waived appellate review of that issue.

4th Cir. R. 34(b) (AThe Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief.@). district court=s order. facts and legal before Accordingly, we affirm the

We dispense with oral argument because the are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the

contentions the court

materials

would

decisional process. AFFIRMED

We have jurisdiction to consider this appeal because the order of dismissal suggests that no amendment to the complaint could cure the defects in Tiffer=s case. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066 (4th Cir. 1993). 2

*