David Henderson v. Bridget Mugane

Filing 920081118

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1867 DAVID E. HENDERSON, Plaintiff Appellant, v. BRIDGET R. MUGANE, Attorney at Law, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01616-CCB) Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 18, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David E. Henderson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David E. Henderson appeals the district court's order dismissing summarily refused without prejudice in him part, in his complaint since against 1983 Defendant has or asserting, to assist that Defendant retirement obtaining medical reemployment with the United States Foreign Service. Because Henderson may amend his complaint to cure the pleading defects identified by the district court, we find that the dismissal order is interlocutory and not appealable. See Chao v. Rivendell Woods, Inc., 415 F.3d 342, 345 (4th Cir. 2005); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). lack of jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?