David Kissi v. Coldwell Banker

Filing 920100402

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1903 DAVID M. KISSI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COLDWELL BANKER; DAVID MUCHOW, Defendants - Appellees. No. 08-1904 DAVID M. KISSI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DK&R CHAPTER 7 ESTATE, AMMENDABLE TRUST; RICHARD M. KREMEN; DLA PIPER OF BALTIMORE, MD; RICHARD E. GREENBERG, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:08-cv-01593-PJM; 8:08-cv-01663-PJM) Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 2, 2010 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David M. Kissi, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Anne Manuelides, SAUL EWING, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; James Patrick Ulwick, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: In from two these consolidated by the appeals, district David court Kissi for appeals Northern orders entered District of Ohio transferring his cases to the district court for the District of Maryland. Because appeals from those orders must be filed in the Sixth Circuit, which has already issued an opinion dismissing one of these appeals, we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1294 (2006). Further, we decline to transfer the appeals to the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit as we do not find that such a transfer is in the interest of justice. 1631 (2006). Accordingly, we deny See 28 U.S.C. motion for Kissi's appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?