Burl Howell v. Delaware
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
BURL ANDERSON HOWELL, Plaintiff Appellant, v. DELAWARE, State of, Defendant Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:08-hc-02036-FL)
February 19, 2009
February 23, 2009
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Burl Anderson Howell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Burl court's District order Court Anderson Howell his seeks to appeal the the district States further
transferring for the
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); (1949). Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541
The order Howell seeks to appeal is neither a final See
order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
In re Carefirst of Md., Inc., 305 F.3d 253, 257 (4th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the motion to consolidate, and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?