Jonathon Moseley v. The Circuit Court of Arlington

Filing 920081219


Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1912 JONATHON MOSELEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY, By its Agent and Officer, the Honorable Benjamin Kendrick; THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY, By its Agent and Officer, The Honorable Joanne Alper; THE OFFICE OF CLERK OF THE COURT, (Elected) By its Agent and Officer, The Honorable Paul Ferguson, Clerk Possibly as Co-Plaintiff to receive Guidance; COLBY MAY, Esq. Officer of the Court; DAVID K. HALLER, Esq. Officer of the Court, Defendants Appellees, and BRAD WEISS, Esq. Officer of the Court, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00255-CMH-TRJ) Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 19, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jonathon Moseley, Appellant Pro Se. Christy Monolo, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Jonathon dismissing related his Moseley appeals under 42 the district court's order and no complaint We have U.S.C. the 1983 (2000) find claims. reviewed record and reversible error. by the district Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated court. Moseley v. The Circuit Court of Arlington, No. 1:08-cv-00255-CMH-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed July 17, 2008 and entered July 18, 2008). We deny Moseley's motion for summary disposition and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials would decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?