Gevorg Hovhannisyan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
GEVORG HOVHANNISYAN, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
February 17, 2009
February 26, 2009
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gevorg Hovhannisyan, Petitioner Pro Se. Daniel Eric Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Washington, D.C.; Eric H. Holder, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Washington, D.C.; George William Maugans, III, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Jem Colleen Sponzo, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Gevorg Hovhannisyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge's denial of his
applications for relief from removal. Hovhannisyan challenges the determination that he
failed to establish eligibility for asylum. of a determination denying eligibility for
To obtain reversal relief, an alien
"must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution." (1992). that INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84
We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude fails to Having meet show that to the evidence compels a
failed the more
withholding of removal.
Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th
Cir. 1999); INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Accordingly, dispense with oral we deny the petition the for facts review. and We legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?