Yuri Stoyanov v. Donald Winter

Filing 920090115

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2040 YURI J. STOYANOV, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary of the Navy; STEPHAN W. PETRI, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of the Carderock Division; GARY M. JEBSEN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 70 Carderock Division; KEVIN M. WILSON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Acting Head of Code 74 Carderock Division; JAMES H. KING, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 74 Carderock Division; JOHN C. DAVIES, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Deputy Head of Code 74 Carderock Division; MATHEW CRAUN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 722 Carderock Division; PAUL SHANG, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 72 Carderock Division; GERALD SMITH, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Deputy Head of Code 70 Carderock Division; ROGER FORD, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 7014 Carderock Division; M. KATHLEEN FOWLER, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Administrative Officer Code 709; DAVID CARON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Assistant Counsel Code 39; JOSEPHINE MCGRATH, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Complaints Manager/Acting Deputy EEO Chief Code 034, Defendants ­ Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:06cv-01244-AMD) Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 15, 2009 Before WILLIAMS, Judges. Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Yuri J. Stoyanov, Appellant Pro Se. Assistant United States Attorney, Appellees. John Walter Sippel, Jr., Baltimore, Maryland, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Yuri J. Stoyanov appeals the district court's order dismissing his claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (2000), the Whisleblower Protection Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 1214, 1221 and 2302 (2006), and various state law tort claims, as well as its order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. find no reversible error. court's orders. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we affirm the district See Stoyanov v. Winter, No. 1:06-cv-01244-AMD We dispense with oral (D. Md. Aug. 11, 2008; Aug. 27, 2008). argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?