Theresa Bradley v. CVS Corporation

Filing 920090727

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2046 THERESA B. BRADLEY, Plaintiff Appellant, v. CVS CORPORATION; CVS OF BETHESDA, LLC; CVS PHARMACY, d/b/a CVS Pharmacy Store #1831; MIDAS, INCORPORATED; MIDAS AUTO REPAIR AND SERVICE HARFORD CAR CARE; STEPHEN TENNANT; SHANE ROSS; SAM DOPPLER; YURIY BRONFMAN; ELENA DONSKAIA; STATE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY; LARISSA MILLER; SCOTT PATRICK BURNS, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:07-cv-02732-PJM) Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 27, 2009 Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Theresa B. Bradley, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Patrick Burns, Toyja E. Kelley, TYDINGS & ROSENBERG, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Frank Furst Daily, III, LAW OFFICES OF FRANK F. DAILY, PA, Hunt Valley, Maryland; Herbert Romulus O'Conor, III, O'CONOR GRANT & SAMUELS, Towson, Maryland; Betty Sue Diener, MARKS, O'NEILL, O'BRIEN & COURTNEY, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Theresa granting complaint. error. the Bradley appeals motion the to district dismiss court's order civil Appellees' Bradley's We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we deny as moot Bradley's motion to vacate this court's dismissal for failure to prosecute and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bradley v. CVS Corp., We dispense with contentions the court are and No. 8:07-cv-02732-PJM (D. Md. Aug. 28, 2008). oral argument because in the the facts and legal before adequately presented materials argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?