David Whitehead v. Strayer University
Filing
920090902
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2060
DAVID LOUIS WHITEHEAD, Plaintiff Appellant, v. STRAYER UNIVERSITY; SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY; HYATT INC.; UNNAMED AKA INC. AND JANE DOE AND 1-25 DOES, Defendants Appellees. HOTEL
No. 09-1154
DAVID LOUIS WHITEHEAD, Plaintiff Appellant, v. STRAYER UNIVERSITY; SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY; HYATT INC.; UNNAMED AKA INC. AND JANE DOE AND 1-25 DOES, Defendants Appellees. HOTEL
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00832-LMB-TCB)
Submitted:
August 26, 2009
Decided:
September 2, 2009
Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Louis Whitehead, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM: David Whitehead appeals the district court's August We
29, 2008, September 8, 2008 and September 11, 2008 orders. have reviewed we the deny record and find no reversible for
error. of
Accordingly,
Whitehead's
motion
appointment
counsel; deny Whitehead's en banc request/motion to seize all products based on Whitehead's intellectual properties; deny
Whitehead's motion for injunction relief to move Wall Street to Richmond, Virginia; deny Whitehead's July 2, 2009 motion to
consolidate his eight pending appeals and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Whitehead v. Strayer Univ.
No. 1:08-cv-00832-MB-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 29, 2008 & entered Sept. 2, 2008; filed Sept. 8, 2009 & entered Sept. 9, 2008; filed & entered Sept. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?