Gene Smith, Sr. v. Roger Hunt
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
GENE E. SMITH, SR., an incompetent person, Plaintiff Appellant, and IDA M. CLARK, Guardian for Gene E. Smith, Sr., Party-in-Interest, v. ROGER L. HUNT, individually; JAMES C. MAHAN, individually; LAWRENCE R. LEAVITT, individually; JOY GARNER, individually; JULIE GIESBRECHT, individually; LANCE WILSON, individually; ATC VANCOM INC, d/b/a ATC Van Deraa; BYRON E. THOMAS; JAMES N. FOSTER, JR.; DANIEL G. FRITZ, Defendants Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (2:08-cv-02068)
December 17, 2008
January 5, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gene E. Smith, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Gene E. Smith, Sr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 2008). legal before Smith v. Hunt, No. 2:08-cv-02068 (D.S.C. Sept. 15,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court Smith's are and adequately argument for presented not in aid the the and materials decisional motion for
appointment of counsel are denied. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?