Michael Adepoju v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Filing 920090630

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2137 MICHAEL ADEMOLA ADEPOJU, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: June 17, 2009 Decided: June 30, 2009 Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jane Candaux, Assistant Director, Aimee J. Frederickson, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Nigeria, petitions Appeals Ademola for Adepoju, of a an native order his and of citizen Board from of of the review the Immigration ("Board") dismissing appeal immigration judge's denial of his requests for adjustment of status and voluntary departure. We have reviewed the record and find that substantial evidence supports the finding that Adepoju is ineligible for adjustment of status and voluntary departure. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. 2008). * legal before See In re: Adepoju (B.I.A. Sept. 10, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional would process. PETITION DENIED We specifically uphold the finding that the order imposing probation without any adjudication of guilt constituted a conviction for immigration purposes. See 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(48)(A) (2006); Yanez-Popp v. INS, 998 F.2d 231 (4th Cir. 1993). * 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?