Rory Mayberry v. Michael Battles
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
RORY MAYBERRY, United United States ex rel.,
Plaintiffs Appellants, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Party-in-Interest, v. MICHAEL BATTLES; SECURITY VENTURES INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED; DANUBIA GLOBAL, INCORPORATED; RICHARD LEVINSON; AMY CLARK; WINDMILL INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED; HANSFORD T. JOHNSON; DOUGLAS COMBS; SCOTT CUSTER, Defendants Appellees, CUSTER BATTLES, LLC, Debtor Appellee, and EMERGENT BUSINESS SERVICES; TARHEEL TRAINING, LLC; ROB ROY TRUMBLE; SALLYPORT GLOBAL HOLDING, LLC; JOSEPH MORRIS; JOHN DEBLASIO, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O'Grady, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00364-LO-TCB)
April 27, 2010
May 21, 2010
Before KING, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor Aronoff Kubli, KUBLI & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Vienna, Virginia, for Appellants. Craig Crandall Reilly, Alexandria, Virginia; Peter Barton Hutt, II, Duncan Stevens, AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Eugene Andrew Burcher, WALSH COLUCCI LUBELEY EMRICH & WALSH, PC, Prince William, Virginia; Scott Custer, Bradenton, Florida, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Rory Mayberry and Robert Isakson appeal the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge, granting the motion for Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 sanctions, dismissing this action with prejudice, and awarding reasonable expenses and fees to Defendants. and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court in its opinion from the bench. Mayberry v. Battles, No. 1:06-cv-00364-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. We dispense with oral argument because the contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the
Oct. 10, 2008). facts and legal before
decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?