Tyrone Hurt v. Eighth Amendment to the U.S. C
Filing
920090313
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2212
TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION; MARY SURRALT; SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 08-2213
TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE; GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States; U.S. SENATE; U.S. CONGRESS; THE COUNTRY OF IRAN, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 08-2215
TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.
No. 08-2216
TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.
No. 08-2218
TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States; U.S. CONGRESS; U.S. SENATE; THE COUNTRY OF IRAN; ALL NEWS MEDIA OF THIS NATION, U.S.A., Defendants - Appellees.
2
No. 08-2226
TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEDLEY AND SINGLETARY, INCORPORATED; COATES AND LANE, INCORPORATED; WOODLEY HOUSE, INCORPORATED; U.S. VS. NICHOLS; HURT VS. USDC DC NAT., Defendants - Appellees.
No. 08-2227
TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CLINTON; U.S.D.C. FOR THE D.C.; U.S.C.A. FOR THE D.C. CIR; FALUN GONG PRACTITIONERS OF CHINA, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 08-2228
TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff - Appellant,
3
v. JIM CROW; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00808-LMB-TCB; 1:08-cv-00913-LMB-TRJ; 1:08-cv-00914-LMB-TRJ; 1:08-cv-00915-LMB-TCB; 1:08-cv-00916-LMBJFA; 1:08-cv-00917-LMB-JFA; 1:08-cv-00918-LMB-TRJ; 1:08-cv00944-LMB-JFA)
Submitted:
January 30, 2009
Decided:
March 13, 2009
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and Circuit Judge.
HAMILTON, Senior
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
4
PER CURIAM: Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court's orders
dismissing these actions as frivolous or for failure to state a claim. are We have reviewed the records and find that the appeals Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for the
frivolous.
reasons stated by the district court.
Hurt v. Eighth Amendment;
Hurt v. The American People; Hurt v. United States; Hurt v. United States; Hurt v. Bush; Hurt v. Dedley and Singletary,
Inc.; Hurt v. Clinton; Hurt v. Jim Crow, Nos. 1:08-cv-00808-LMBTCB; 1:08-cv-00913-LMB-TRJ; 1:08-cv-00914-LMB-TRJ; 1:08-cv-
00915-LMB-TCB;
1:08-cv-00916-LMB-JFA;
1:08-cv-00917-LMB-JFA; (E.D. Va. filed We legal
1:08-cv-00918-LMB-TRJ;
1:08-cv-00944-LMB-JFA
Sept. 9, 2008, entered Sept. 11, 2008; Sept. 12, 2008). dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?