UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JAMES JOSEPH OWENS, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
December 16, 2008
January 7, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Joseph Owens, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: James Joseph Owens petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking both a declaration that he is a "prima facie multiple victim of double jeopardy" and an order that the district court "vacate sentences and immediately release" him. Mandamus is a
drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1974); In re: Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus relief
is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re: First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 860 F.2d A mandamus petitioner must show to to the relief sought, that the act
135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). that he has a clear a right duty
requested, and that the plaintiff has no other adequate remedy. Id. We showing. pauperis, dispense conclude that Owens has not made the required
Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma we with deny oral the petition for writ the of mandamus. and We legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?