Claude Holland v. State of Maryland

Filing 920100406

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2377 CLAUDE HOLLAND; LORI HOLLAND, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. STATE OF MARYLAND; R. HUNTER NELMS, JR.; ROBERT VAN METER, Major, Defendants - Appellees, and WICOMICO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:07cv-03040-AMD) Submitted: March 23, 2010 Decided: April 6, 2010 Before TRAXLER, Judges. Chief Judge, and MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robin R. Cockey, COCKEY, BRENNAN & MALONEY, P.C., Salisbury, Maryland, for Appellants. Douglas F. Gansler, Attorney General of Maryland, H. Scott Curtis, Assistant Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Attorney General, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Claude and Lori Holland, husband and wife, filed suit against Defendants alleging state and federal law causes of action relating to Claude's suspension and termination from his position with the Wicomico County Sheriff's Office. The district court granted summary judgment for Defendants finding the Hollands' claims were barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, Holland We we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. v. Maryland, No. 1:07-cv-03040-AMD (D. Md. Dec. 5, 2008). dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?