Claude Holland v. State of Maryland
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
CLAUDE HOLLAND; LORI HOLLAND, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. STATE OF MARYLAND; R. HUNTER NELMS, JR.; ROBERT VAN METER, Major, Defendants - Appellees, and WICOMICO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:07cv-03040-AMD)
March 23, 2010
April 6, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robin R. Cockey, COCKEY, BRENNAN & MALONEY, P.C., Salisbury, Maryland, for Appellants. Douglas F. Gansler, Attorney General
of Maryland, H. Scott Curtis, Assistant Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Claude and Lori Holland, husband and wife, filed suit against Defendants alleging state and federal law causes of
action relating to Claude's suspension and termination from his position with the Wicomico County Sheriff's Office. The
district court granted summary judgment for Defendants finding the Hollands' claims were barred by res judicata. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, Holland We
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
v. Maryland, No. 1:07-cv-03040-AMD (D. Md. Dec. 5, 2008). dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?