Muhammad Khan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
MUHAMMAD NAEEM KHAN, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
July 29, 2009
August 14, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey B. Steinfeld, REM ZELLER LAW GROUP, Hackensack, New Jersey, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, William C. Peachey, Assistant Director, Brianne Whelan Cohen, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Muhammad Naeem Khan, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") upholding the immigration judge's denial of his motion for a continuance and denying his motion to remand. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See Lendo v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d 439, 441 (4th Cir. 2007)
(setting forth standard of review for the denial of a motion for a continuance); Onyeme v. INS, 146 F.3d 227, 234 (4th Cir. 1998) (setting forth standard of review for the denial of a motion to remand). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review
substantially for the reasons stated by the Board. Khan (B.I.A. Nov. 28, 2008).
See In re
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?