US v. James Jones
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMES ERIC JONES, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:06-cr-01238-TLW-1)
January 29, 2009
February 20, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven M. Hisker, HISKER LAW FIRM, PC, Duncan, South Carolina, for Appellant. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: James Eric Jones was convicted by a jury of possession of a firearm by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2), (e) (2006). Finding that Jones was an armed career
criminal under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (2006), the district court sentenced him to 520 to months' 456 months' imprisonment, imprisonment which pursuant was to
Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). Jones's attorney has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging Jones's designation as an armed career criminal. Counsel states,
however, that he has found no meritorious grounds for appeal. Jones has filed a pro se supplemental brief raising several
We affirm. Jones's prior convictions include South Carolina
convictions for second degree burglary, attempted burglary, two convictions for strong arm robbery, and two convictions for
assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature incident to the respective robberies. A defendant is an armed career
criminal when he violates 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and has three prior convictions for violent felonies or serious drug offenses. 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). A violent felony is one that "has as an
element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another" 2 or "otherwise involves
injury to another." Guidelines Manual
18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B); U.S. Sentencing § 4B1.2(a)(1) (2007). This definition
specifically includes burglary.
18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii).
To determine whether a state offense falls within the definition of a violent felony, we use a categorical approach, which "takes into account only the definition of the offense and the fact of conviction." 286 (4th Cir. 2002). under state law is United States v. Pierce, 278 F.3d 282, The particular label or categorization not controlling. See Taylor v. United
States, 495 U.S. 575, 590-91 (1990). strong arm robbery as "the felonious
South Carolina defines or unlawful taking of
money, goods, or other personal property of any value from the person of another or in his presence by violence or by putting such person in fear." (S.C. 1996) (internal State v. Gourdine, 472 S.E.2d 241, 241 quotation marks and citation omitted).
Assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature is defined as "the unlawful act of violent injury to another accompanied by circumstances of aggravation." 512, 516 (S.C. 2000). State v. Fennell, 531 S.E.2d
"A person is guilty of burglary in the
second degree if the person enters a dwelling without consent and with intent to commit a crime therein." § 16-11-312 (2005). S.C. Code Ann.
As these prior convictions are all violent
crimes under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1), we find that the district court did not err in designating Jones an armed career criminal. We have also reviewed the arguments raised in Jones's pro se supplemental brief and find them to be without merit. Although Jones alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective, claims of ineffective counsel generally are not cognizable on appeal. 1997). § United States v. King, 119 F.3d 290, 295 (4th Cir. Jones can pursue this claim in a motion under 28 U.S.C.
2255 (West Supp. 2008). In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the record
in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm Jones's conviction and sentence. This
court requires that counsel inform Jones, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Jones requests that a petition be filed, but
counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from
Counsel's motion must state that a copy thereof We dispense with oral argument because the are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the
was served on Jones. facts and legal before
contentions the court
decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?