US v. James McRobie

Filing 920090114

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-4632 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. JAMES DALE MCROBIE, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:07-cr-00474-HEH-1) Submitted: December 12, 2008 Decided: January 14, 2009 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Frances H. Pratt, Alice V. Sheridan, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Chuck Rosenberg, United States Attorney, David T. Maguire, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James firearm by a Dale person McRobie pled to guilty a to possession of a in committed mental institution violation of 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(4) (2006). sixteen release. months of imprisonment and He was sentenced to years supervised three One of his special conditions of supervision was to "stay away from any official event, political event, or campaign event attended by the President of the United States or any candidate for the Presidency of the United States." (JA 52). On appeal, McRobie raises three issues: (1) whether the district court erred by imposing a sentence greater than necessary because the imprisonment portion of the sentence amounts to an involuntary civil commitment; (2) whether the district court erred by imposing the special condition of supervised release; and (3) whether his conviction was unconstitutional in light of Dist. of Columbia v. Heller, 128 S. Ct. 2783 (2008). reasons that follow, we affirm. First, McRobie provides no authority for his argument that his sixteen-month sentence could be considered an For the involuntary civil commitment. of discretion in McRobie's More generally, we find no abuse sentence, which was within his properly-calculated advisory Sentencing Guidelines range of ten to sixteen months. Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586, 596 (2007); United States v. Pauley, 511 F.3d 468, 473 (4th Cir. 2 2007). A sentence imposed within the advisory range is presumptively reasonable. 193 (4th Cir. 2007). United States v. Allen, 491 F.3d 178, As McRobie concedes on appeal, this court reviews his second issue for plain error, as he failed to object to the special condition below. United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, McRobie has failed to show away" order was plainly 732 (1993) (providing standard). that the district Id. court's "stay erroneous. McRobie's final claim of error founders on the very case upon which it relies. a Second Amendment right While the Heller opinion recognized for citizens to bear arms, it specifically cautioned that "nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill." 128 S. Ct. at 2816-17. Accordingly, sentence. legal before we affirm McRobie's Heller, conviction and We dispense with oral argument because the facts and are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional contentions the court would process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?