US v. Michael Greer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL GREER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Thomas E. Johnston, District Judge. (5:08-cr-00061-1)
April 23, 2009
April 29, 2009
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne, Appellate Counsel, George H. Lancaster, Jr., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Michael Greer appeals the district court's judgment
imposing a sentence of 180 months of imprisonment for aiding and abetting the possession with intent to distribute a quantity of heroin. to On appeal, Greer's counsel has filed a brief pursuant v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), noting no
meritorious issues for appeal, but raising the issue of whether the district court erred by imposing an unreasonable sentence. Greer was informed of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief but elected not to do so. Finding no error, we affirm.
We review Greer's sentence for abuse of discretion. Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586, 597 (2007). The first
step in this review requires us to ensure that the district court committed no significant procedural error, such as
improperly calculating the guidelines range.
United States v.
Osborne, 514 F.3d 377, 387 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 2525 (2008). We then consider the substantive reasonableness of
the sentence imposed, taking into account the totality of the circumstances. sentence on Gall, 128 S. Ct. at 597. appeal, we presume that is a When reviewing a sentence reasonable. within a
States v. Allen, 491 F.3d 178, 193 (4th Cir. 2007). The record reveals that the district court understood the Guidelines are advisory, considered 2 the 18 U.S.C.A. §
3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008) factors, and sentenced Greer within range his of properly-calculated 151-188 months of advisory Sentencing Guidelines these
circumstances, we find the sentence was reasonable. F.3d at 193.
In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm the district court's judgment.
This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. filed, but counsel If the client requests that a petition be believes that such a petition would be
frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel's motion must state that We dispense with oral
a copy thereof was served on the client.
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?