US v. Scott Gustin
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SCOTT DELL GUSTIN, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:07-cr-00172-BO-1)
May 21, 2009
May 26, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Woodward Webb, THE EDMISTEN & WEBB LAW FIRM, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. George E.B. Holding, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Scott Dell Gustin appeals from his conviction for
assault on another inmate.
On appeal, Gustin argues that the We affirm. of the
evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. A defendant challenging the
evidence faces a heavy burden. F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir.
United States v. Beidler, 110 "[A]n appellate court's
reversal of a conviction on grounds of insufficient evidence should be confined to cases where the prosecution's failure is clear." 1984). United States v. Jones, 735 F.2d 785, 791 (4th Cir. A jury's verdict must be upheld on appeal if there is Glasser v.
substantial evidence in the record to support it. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942).
In determining whether
the evidence in the record is substantial, this court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government and
inquires whether there is evidence that a reasonable finder of fact could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a
conclusion of a defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Burgos, 94 F.3d 849, 862 (4th Cir. 1996). In
evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, this court does not review the credibility of the witnesses and assumes that the jury resolved all contradictions in the testimony in favor of the Government. Cir. 1998). 2 United States v. Romer, 148 F.3d 359, 364 (4th
At trial, all the eyewitnesses, including the victim, identified Gustin as the perpetrator. In addition, another
witness testified that Gustin later admitted that he had beaten the victim. Gustin's claim of insufficient evidence rests on
inconsistencies as to the length of the beating, the amount of blood involved, and whether Gustin was able to conceal or remove evidence, as well as testimony that Gustin did not have any blood on him. unreliable guilt While Gustin asserts that that this "mosaic of was inadequate doubt, to we support do not a finding review of the
credibility of witnesses, and we assume the jury resolved all contradictions in the testimony in favor of the Government. Romer, 148 F.3d at 364. See
In fact, Gustin pointed out these
inconsistencies to the jury, and we will not overturn the jury's decision to credit the multiple identifications of Gustin. We
therefore conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support the convictions. We therefore affirm Gustin's conviction. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?