US v. Michael Tedder
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL TEDDER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06-cr-00331-JFM-3)
August 20, 2009
Decided: August 24, 2009
Before WILKINSON and Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
A.D. Martin, LAW OFFICE OF ANTHONY D. MARTIN, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. James Thomas Wallner, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Pursuant to a plea agreement, Michael Tedder pled
guilty to conspiracy to distribute and intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
§§ 841(a), (b)(1)(A), 846 (2006).
The district court sentenced
Tedder to 168 months' imprisonment, after departing from the applicable sentencing range, plus a five year term of supervised release. v. Tedder's counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders 386 U.S. 738 (1967), claiming ineffective
assistance of counsel, but concluding that no meritorious issues for appeal exist. Tedder was advised of his right to file a pro
se supplemental brief, but did not do so. On direct appeal, a defendant may raise a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel "if and only if it
conclusively appears from the record that his counsel did not provide effective assistance." F.3d 972, 979 (4th Cir. 1998). the defendant must fell show two United States v. Martinez, 136 To prove ineffective assistance, things: an (1) "that counsel's of
reasonableness" and (2) "that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 694 (1984).
In the context of a
guilty plea, "the defendant must show that there is a reasonable 2
probability that, but for counsel's errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial." v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). Hill
Our review of the record
reveals no conclusive evidence that Tedder's counsel did not provide effective assistance. In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm Tedder's conviction and sentence. This
court requires that counsel inform Tedder, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Tedder requests that a petition be filed,
but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from
Counsel's motion must state that a copy thereof We dispense with oral argument because
was served on Tedder.
the facts and legal conclusions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?