Maurice Juggins v. Janet Wurie
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
MAURICE JUGGINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JANET WURIE, Nurse Practitioner; STAN BERRY, Sheriff; HARDY, Nurse; MALIK, Dr.; QUINTANA, Lt., Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:07-cv-01126-TSE-TCB)
April 14, 2008
May 1, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Maurice Juggins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Maurice Juggins, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). In his informal appellate
brief, Juggins failed to address the district court's basis for dismissing his claims against Janet Wurie, Dr. Malik, and Nurse Hardy. claims. Therefore, Juggins has waived appellate review of those See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) ("The Court will limit its review to We have reviewed the
the issues raised in the informal brief.").
record as to Juggins' claims against the remaining Defendants and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Juggins v. Wurie, No. 1:07-cv-01126TSE-TCB (E.D. Va. Nov. 23, 2007). We also deny Juggins' motions
for appointment of counsel and dismissal of payments for filing fees. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?