Gregory Richardson v. James Sisk

Filing 920081119

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6050 GREGORY A. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. JAMES SISK, Manager/Compute; GENE JOHNSON, Director; ROBERT MCDONALD, Attorney General; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendants ­ Appellees. No. 08-6769 GREGORY A. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. JAMES SISK, Manager/Compute; GENE JOHNSON, Director; ROBERT MCDONALD, Attorney General; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendants ­ Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00488-REP) Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 19, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory A. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Gregory A. Richardson appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) for failure to pay his filing fee, and the order denying his motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the orders and record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated See Richardson v. Sisk, No. 3:07-cvWe dispense reversible error. by the district court. 00488-REP (E.D. Va. Oct. 26, 2007; Apr. 28, 2008). with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?