Gregory Rice v. State of Maryland
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
GREGORY RICE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF MARYLAND; GREGORY ALTON, Washington County Sheriff's Department; TARA BENDER, Washington County Sheriff's Department; DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY; CIRCUIT COURT; STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-cv03294-RWT)
March 27, 2008
April 4, 2008
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Rice, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Gregory dismissing complaint.* error. without Rice appeals the 42 district U.S.C. court's § 1983 order (2000)
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Rice v. Maryland, No. 8:07-cv-03294-RWT (D. Md. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
district court. Jan. 3, 2008).
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Generally, dismissals without prejudice are interlocutory and not appealable. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066 (4th Cir. 1993). However, a dismissal without prejudice could be final if no amendment to the complaint could cure the defect in the plaintiff's case. Id. at 1066-67. We conclude that the defects in this case can only be cured by something more than an amendment to the complaint and that the order is therefore appealable. - 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?