Edson Furtado v. Montgomery County, Maryland

Filing 920080430

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6194

EDSON FURTADO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY DEPARTMENT, COUNTY, MARYLAND; MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:07-cv-02755-RDB)

Submitted:

April 24, 2008

Decided:

April 30, 2008

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edson Furtado, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Barry Lattner, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Edson Furtado appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed

Accordingly, we deny

Furtado's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Furtado v. Montgomery

County, Md., No. 1:07-cv-02755-RDB (D. Md. filed Jan. 14, 2008 & entered Jan. 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the

materials

would

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -