Edson Furtado v. Montgomery County, Maryland

Filing 920080430

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6194 EDSON FURTADO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY DEPARTMENT, COUNTY, MARYLAND; MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:07-cv-02755-RDB) Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 30, 2008 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edson Furtado, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Barry Lattner, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Edson Furtado appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we deny Furtado's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Furtado v. Montgomery County, Md., No. 1:07-cv-02755-RDB (D. Md. filed Jan. 14, 2008 & entered Jan. 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials would decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?