Edson Furtado v. Paul DeWolfe
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
EDSON FURTADO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PAUL DEWOLFE, Director of Public Defender, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-cv03379-RWT)
April 24, 2008
April 30, 2008
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edson Furtado, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Edson Furtado appeals the district court's order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed
Accordingly, we deny
Furtado's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Furtado v. DeWolfe, No. We dispense with oral
8:07-cv-03379-RWT (D. Md. Jan. 31, 2008).
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?