William Church v. U.S. Government
Certiorari dismissed, March 9, 2009
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM LEBRON ANDREW CHURCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. GOVERNMENT; SECRETARY OF DEFENSE; U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL; ROBERT S. MUELLER, Director; SECRETARY, VETERANS AFFAIRS; WILLIAM J. DANIELS, (Bill), Recruiter; GENERAL COUNSEL AND STAFF; MICHAEL L. ALSTON, Director, U.S. Department of Justice; JOHN K. SINGLAUB; DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; R. C. NIXON, Ms.; TERRY GLENN, Mr.; DIRECTOR, CHAIRMAN, VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD; C.A. COLLINS; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OMBUDSMAN; JUNE KIM BRIEL, Inspector General, Virginia Department of Corrections; VIRGINIA SECRETARY OF PUBLIC SAFETY; THOMAS W. WARREN, Judge, Circuit Court of Amelia County, Virginia; THOMAS STARK, Commonwealth Attorney; LEE R. HARRISON, Commonwealth Attorney; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA; ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA; DONALD FORD, Jr., Esquire; GRAHAM T. JENNINGS, Esquire; HUDSON, Mr., Esquire; CURTIS G. HUDSON, Esquire; WILLIAM NEWSOME, Esquire; R. CLINTON CLARY, Jr., Esquire; CHIEF JUDGE, Court of Appeals of Virginia; CHIEF JUDGE, Supreme Court of Virginia; RICHARD L. WILLIAMS, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia; KAREN J. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit; DOES UNKNOWN, Unidentified, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:07-cv-00129-HEH)
September 16, 2008
September 19, 2008
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Lebron Andrew Church, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: William Lebron Andrew Church appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Church v. U.S. Gov't, No. 3:07-cv-00129-HEH We deny Church's motions to appoint We dispense with oral argument
(E.D. Va. Jan. 29, 2008).
counsel and for other relief.
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?