Albert Mills v. Warden

Filing 920080819

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6371 ALBERT CURTIS MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:07-cv-03466-DKC) Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 19, 2008 Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Albert Curtis Mills, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Albert Curtis Mills seeks to appeal the district court's order placing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint on the unassigned docket in accordance with Mills' pre-filing injunction. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not err. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mills v. Warden, No. 8:07-cv-03466-DKC (D. Md. Jan. 8, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?