Frankie McCoy, Sr. v. Richard Rosenblatt

Filing 920081222

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6440 FRANKIE L. MCCOY, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICHARD B. ROSENBLATT, Secretary Treatment Service; WALTER WIRSCHING, Director Inmate Health Care; MIMOSE DAZOULOUTE, Health Care Manager, Each Defendant sued Individual and Official Capacity; WILLIAM L. WILLIAMS; JACK J. CHAGWAY; PRISON HEALTH SERVICE, INCORPORATED; JONESSA MILKEN; JEAN L. BYASSEE; DERJE TESFAYE; ADEL GASHE; GETACHEN TEFFERRA, MD; SEDLY YOHANNES, MD; ABRAHAM GEDE MICHAEL; MARY ROLLES; CYNTHIA SINCLAIN; PEGGY BONOVICH, Defendants Appellees, and KEVIN HOY, MD, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:05-cv-00480-WDQ) Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 22, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Thomas Patrick Turgeon, ADELMAN, SHEFF & SMITH, LLC, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCoy v. Rosenblatt, No. 1:05-cv-00480-WDQ (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2008). dispense with We deny McCoy's motion to appoint counsel and oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?