US v. William Grant
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WILLIAM NATHANIEL GRANT, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (3:92-cr-00036-sgw)
June 19, 2008
July 16, 2008
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Nathaniel Grant, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: William Nathaniel Grant appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for
reduction of sentence.
We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Grant, No. 3:92-cr-00036-sgw We dispense with oral argument because
(W.D. Va. Mar. 24, 2008).
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?