William Bonner v. M. Rivera

Filing 920081126

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6709 WILLIAM LAMAR BONNER, a/k/a William Bonner, Petitioner - Appellant, v. M L. RIVERA, Estill, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. William W. Wilkins, Senior Circuit Judge, sitting by designation. (8:07-cv-01498-GRA) Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 26, 2008 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Lamar Bonner, Appellant Pro Se, Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William district court's Bonner, order a federal the prisoner, appeals of the the accepting recommendation magistrate judge and remanding his request for relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000) petition to the United States Bureau of Prisons. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral 54(b); (1949). motion orders, v. 28 U.S.C. 1292 Indus. (2000); Loan Fed. R. Civ. U.S. P. 541 Cohen Beneficial Corp., 337 Following the district court's order, Bonner filed a pursuant that, to Fed. R. Civ. the P. 60(b)(3), Bureau of in which he had asserted upon remand, Prisons erroneously rejected his renewed application for nunc pro tunc designation. However, the district court has yet to issue a Accordingly, we dismiss the final order in regard to this renewed claim. because a final order has not been entered, appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?