William Alton, III v. Doctor Mathis
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM E. ALTON, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DOCTOR MATHIS, M.D.; MARYAM MESSAFORTH, P.A.; KEVIN JOHNSON, P.A.; NURSE CAROL, R.N.; CMS MEDICAL CONTRACTOR; DOCTOR BAHANNA, M.D.; MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; KATHERINE GREEN, Warden; RONALD DRYDEN, Assistant Warden; VICTORIA BURKHARD; ROBERT HANKE, Security Chief; JOHN A. ROWLEY, Commissioner of Correctional Institution; JAMES A. SMITH, Maryland Reception Diagnostic and Classification Center, Warden; MICHAEL STOUFFER; JAMES MURPHY, Assistant; TERRANCE TAYLOR, Sergeant; CHARLES GAITHER, C.O.2; GREGORY WARD, E.C.I. Sergeant; J. TYLER, Case Management Specialist; SUPERVISOR PARKINSON; M FITCHETT; SPECIALIST ENDLINCH; LIEUTENANT DRURY, ECI-Intell; IDA Y. OSITELU, Dietary Supervisor; CONNIE SHAFT, C.D.R.M.R.D.; B. WHITTINGTON, Lieutenant; LIEUTENANT RICHO; THORNTON, C.D.O.; TILLAMNHAYWOOD, C.D.O.; K. HUYKNH, C.D.O.; HANNAH, C.O.S; WALSKE, C.O.S.; KESSLER, C.O.2; G. R. TYLER, C.O.2; JOHNSON, C.O.2; MAJOR MAYCOCK; CAPTAIN KING; LIEUTENANT BARNES; JUDITH HATHWAY, P.A., in their individual and official capacities; GUNTER, C.O.2; BOBBY SHEARIN, Deputy Commissioner, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:07-cv-01499-AW)
July 22, 2008
July 28, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William E. Alton, III, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Katrina J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland; Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM: William E. Alton, III, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have
Accordingly, we Alton v.
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mathis, No. 8:07-cv-01499-AW (D. Md. Apr. 21, 2008).
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?