Zikiteran Robinson v. J. Owens

Filing 920080917


Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6814 ZIKITERAN D. ROBINSON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. J. OWENS, Warden; BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (4:07-cv-03118-HMH) Submitted: September 8, 2008 Decided: September 17, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Zikiteran D. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Zikiteran D. Robinson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000) petition. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Robinson v. Owens, No. 4:07-cv-03118-HMH (D.S.C. Additionally, we deny Robinson's motion for We dispense with oral argument district court.* Mar. 20, 2008). production of discovery materials. because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED While Robinson sufficiently objected to the magistrate judge's findings regarding whether he was in the primary custody of the federal government at the time of his arrest, he failed to specifically object to the remainder of the magistrate judge's recommendations, thereby waiving appellate review of those claims. See United States v. Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 621-22 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 3032 (2007). 2 *

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?