US v. Ronald Rose
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RONALD STUART ROSE, a/k/a Rahking, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:03-cr-444)
September 17, 2008
October 8, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Stuart Rose, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Ronald Stuart Rose appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. We have
§ 3582(c)(2) (2000), and his motion for reconsideration. reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we United We
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
States v. Rose, No. 3:03-cr-444 (E.D. Va. May 16 & 29, 2008).
deny the motions for appointment of counsel and for a certificate of appealability and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?