US v. Anthony Baker

Filing 920080827

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6933 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTHONY MARCELLUS BAKER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:94cr-00361-PJM-l; 8:08-cv-01102-PJM-l) Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 27, 2008 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Marcellus Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony Marcellus Baker appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C.A. 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008). and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Baker, Nos. 8:94-cr-00361-PJM-l; 8:08-cv-01102-PJM-l (D. Md. filed May 1, 2008 and entered May 2, 2008; May 9, 2008).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED To the extent that Baker seeks to raise his claims by way of a 28 U.S.C. 2255 (2000) motion, the district court properly noted that he must first obtain authorization from this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2244 (2000). 2 *

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?