US v. Dennis Brewer
Filing
920081029
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7126
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff- Appellee, v. DENNIS ALLEN BREWER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, Senior District Judge. (1:91-cr-00342-TSE-1)
Submitted:
October 21, 2008
Decided:
October 29, 2008
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis Allen Brewer, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Nicole Gibson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Dennis court's order to Allen Brewer his seeks to appeal from under criminal the 360 18 district months' U.S.C.A. the
reducing 324 &
sentence imprisonment
imprisonment § 3582 (West
months' Supp.
2000
2008).
In
cases,
defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); see United
States v. Alvarez, 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000) (holding that § 3582 proceeding is criminal in nature and ten-day appeal period applies). With or without a motion, upon a showing of
excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed.
R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). The 2008. district court entered its order on April 25,
The notice of appeal was filed on June 19, 2008.
Because
Brewer failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension dispense of with the appeal period, we dismiss the the facts appeal. and We legal
oral
argument
because
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?