US v. Antonio Rogers
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTONIO ALFONZO ROGERS, a/k/a Monkey, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:94-cr-00092-FDW-2)
April 2, 2009
April 15, 2009
Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Claire J. Rauscher, Federal Public Defender, Charlotte, North Carolina; Matthew Segal, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Antonio order determining Alfonzo that to Rogers he 18 is appeals the district for a court's sentence or
alternatively that the court would deny his motion as a matter of discretion based upon his post-sentencing conduct. Finding
no reversible error, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Rogers, No. 3:94-cr-00092-FDW-2
(W.D.N.C. June 5, 2008). of counsel.
We deny Rogers' motion for appointment
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?