US v. Curtis Beasley
Filing
920081120
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7216
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CURTIS A. BEASLEY, a/k/a Pooh, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (6:02-cr-01358-HMH-3)
Submitted:
November 13, 2008
Decided:
November 20, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis A. Beasley, Appellant Pro Se. Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Curtis Beasley appeals the district court's order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. the record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Beasley, dispense No. with 6:02-cr-01358-HMH-3 oral argument (D.S.C. July the 3, 2008). and We legal
because
facts
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?