Jay Newton v. G. Washington

Filing 920090223

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7274 JAY NEWTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. G. K. WASHINGTON, Regional Director; D. M. VAUGHAN, Warden; S. A. TINSLEY, Investigator; WALKER, Investigator; D. SAUNDERS, Hearing Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00599-LMB-JFA) Submitted: January 22, 2009 Decided: February 23, 2009 Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jay Newton, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jay Newton appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, Newton 24, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * v. Washington, No. 1:08-cv-00599-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. June 2008). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional would process. AFFIRMED We specifically note that Newton's claim that he is excused from administratively grieving his claims based on futility is without merit. See Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 741 n.6 (2004). * 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?