US v. Monty Marshall

Filing 920090115

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7363

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff ­ Appellee, v. MONTY MARSHALL, a/k/a Mustafa, Defendant ­ Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:02-cr-00002-RGD-TEM-1)

Submitted:

January 13, 2009

Decided:

January 15, 2009

Before WILLIAMS, Judges.

Chief

Judge,

and

TRAXLER

and

KING,

Circuit

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monty Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Special Assistant United States Virginia, for Appellee.

Timothy Richard Murphy, Attorney, Newport News,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Monty Williams appeals the district court's order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

(2006) motion for reduction

of sentence based on Amendment 706, as modified by Amendment 711, and Amendment 715 of the United States Sentencing

Guidelines. error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the United States v. Marshall, No. 4:02-cr-0002In addition, we find that

district court.

RGD-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. July 14, 2008).

the court did not abuse its discretion in declining to appoint counsel. legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional

contentions the court

would

process. AFFIRMED

2