Charles Cassell, III v. Doctor Jagust

Filing 920090218

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7602

CHARLES M. CASSELL, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DOCTOR JAGUST; DOCTOR MICHALAS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:06-ct-03025-BO)

Submitted:

January 30, 2009

Decided:

February 18, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles M. Cassell, III, Appellant Pro Se. McCullough, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Carolina, for Appellees.

Elizabeth Raleigh,

Pharr North

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Charles M. Cassell, III, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cassell v. Jagust, No. 5:06-ct-03025-BO (E.D.N.C.

Aug. 5, 2008). to show cause

We deny the motions for appointment of counsel, and compel officials to supply materials, for

injunctive relief, for reconsideration, and for access to this and other courts. as moot. legal before The motion "in the forma pauperis" is denied

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional

contentions the court

would

process. AFFIRMED

2