Charles Cassell, III v. Doctor Jagust
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
CHARLES M. CASSELL, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DOCTOR JAGUST; DOCTOR MICHALAS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:06-ct-03025-BO)
January 30, 2009
February 18, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles M. Cassell, III, Appellant Pro Se. McCullough, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Charles M. Cassell, III, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cassell v. Jagust, No. 5:06-ct-03025-BO (E.D.N.C.
Aug. 5, 2008). to show cause
We deny the motions for appointment of counsel, and compel officials to supply materials, for
injunctive relief, for reconsideration, and for access to this and other courts. as moot. legal before The motion "in the forma pauperis" is denied
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional
contentions the court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?