US v. Nicholean Hicklen, Jr.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. NICHOLEAN BERNARD HICKLEN, JR., Defendant Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:99-cr-00187-FDW-1)
January 13, 2009
January 16, 2009
Before WILLIAMS, Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nicholean Bernard Hicklen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Nicholean Bernard Hicklen, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for reduction of sentence. no reversible error. (2006) motion
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons United States v. Hicklen, No. We dispense with contentions the court are and
stated by the district court.
3:99-cr-00187-FDW-1 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 2008). oral argument because in the the facts and legal before
argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?