US v. Zelman Roach

Filing 920081202

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7721

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ZELMAN ROACH, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:05-cr-00207-RLW-1)

Submitted:

November 20, 2008

Decided:

December 2, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zelman Roach, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Zelman denying (2006). error. his Roach appeals the to district 18 court's order

motion

filed

pursuant

U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2)

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the United States v. Roach, No. 3:05-cr-00207-RLW-1 12, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

district court. (E.D. Va. Aug.

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

2