US v. Jamal Mitchell
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMAL MITCHELL, a/k/a Boo, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:02-cr-00025-JCC-1)
April 23, 2009
April 30, 2009
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamal Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Jamal Mitchell appeals the district court's order
denying his motion for the return of property, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g). for return of We review the denial of a Rule 41(g) motion for an abuse of discretion. United We have
States v. Chambers, 192 F.3d 374, 376 (3d Cir. 1999). reviewed the record and find no abuse of
Accordingly, we deny Mitchell's motion for substantive relief and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mitchell, No. 1:02-cr-00025-JCC-1 (E.D. See Va.
Aug. 20, 2008). facts and legal before
We dispense with oral argument because the contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the
decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?