US v. Jamal Mitchell

Filing 920090430

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7944

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMAL MITCHELL, a/k/a Boo, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:02-cr-00025-JCC-1)

Submitted:

April 23, 2009

Decided:

April 30, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamal Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Jamal Mitchell appeals the district court's order

denying his motion for the return of property, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g). for return of We review the denial of a Rule 41(g) motion for an abuse of discretion. United We have

property

States v. Chambers, 192 F.3d 374, 376 (3d Cir. 1999). reviewed the record and find no abuse of

discretion.

Accordingly, we deny Mitchell's motion for substantive relief and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mitchell, No. 1:02-cr-00025-JCC-1 (E.D. See Va.

Aug. 20, 2008). facts and legal before

We dispense with oral argument because the contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the

materials

would

decisional process. AFFIRMED

2