US v. Okang Rochelle
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. OKANG KAREEM ROCHELLE, Defendant Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (1:05-cr-00112-UA-1)
February 17, 2009
March 9, 2009
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Okang Kareem Rochelle, Appellant Pro Se. Anand P. Ramaswamy, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Okang court's order Kareem granting Rochelle his seeks to appeal new the district and the
court's finding that he is competent to stand trial. may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,
This court 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). Rochelle seeks to appeal is neither a final
The order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. oral argument because in the the facts and legal before
Accordingly, we We dispense with contentions the court are and
argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?