US v. Okang Rochelle
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. OKANG KAREEM ROCHELLE, Defendant Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:05-cr-00112-UA-1)
April 8, 2009
April 15, 2009
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Okang Kareem Rochelle, Appellant Pro Se. Anand P. Ramaswamy, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Okang Kareem Rochelle seeks to appeal the district
court's October 6, 2008 oral order disposing of various motions filed by Rochelle. over final orders, This court may exercise jurisdiction only 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). neither a final order The order Rochelle seeks to appeal is nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. of jurisdiction. facts and legal before
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack We dispense with oral argument because the contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the
decisional process. DISMISSED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?