Harvey Short v. Prime Care Medical

Filing 920090323

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8317 HARVEY P. SHORT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRED; DR CORDER, Psychiatrist; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BUSH; NURSE; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TERRY; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BARRY; LIEUTENANT ROGERS; JOHN MCKAY, Jail Administrator; DAVID FARMER, Counselor Supervisor; LAVANA DAVIS-HARVEY, Counselor; SERGEANT THOMPSON; SERGEANT BINOIN; SERGEANT ATKINS; MARK BECK, Physician Assistant; SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL JAIL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, Chief District Judge. (2:06-cv-00933) Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 23, 2009 Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harvey P. Short, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Dustin Dillard, John Dorsey Hoffman, FLAHERTY, SENSABAUGH & BONASSO, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Chad Marlo Cardinal, Assistant Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia; Mark William Browning, David L. Shuman, Sr., SHUMAN, MCCUSKEY & SLICER, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Harvey P. Short appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Short's motion for reconsideration of the order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. and find no reversible error. reasons Medical, dispense stated No. with by the district We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the court. Va. Short Oct. the v. Prime 2008). and Care We legal 2:06-cv-00933 oral (S.D.W. 17, facts argument because contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?