Roger Deal, Sr. v. Michael Bell
Filing
920090527
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8606
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, v. MICHAEL BELL, Respondent - Appellee.
No. 09-6070
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, v. MICHAEL BELL, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:08-hc-02132-FL)
Submitted:
May 21, 2009
Decided:
May 27, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roger Lee Deal, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM: Roger court's order Lee Deal, Sr., as seeks to appeal 28 the district § 2254
dismissing
successive
his
U.S.C.
(2006) petition and the court's subsequent order denying his request for a certificate of appealability. appealable certificate (2006). unless of a circuit justice See 28 or The orders are not judge issues a
appealability.
U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1)
A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. by § 2253(c)(2) (2006). that A prisoner satisfies would this find
standard
demonstrating
reasonable
jurists
that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. See
Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 record showing. (4th and Cir. 2001). that We have independently not made reviewed the the
conclude
Deal
has
requisite
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability We dispense with oral argument because
and dismiss the appeals.
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process. DISMISSED 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?