US v. Frederick Civers
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. FREDERICK LAMAR CIVERS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:99-cr-00066-FDW-1)
April 23, 2009
May 4, 2009
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick Lamar Civers, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Frederick Lamar Civers appeals from the district
court's order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm for United States v. We legal
the reasons stated by the district court.
Civers, No. 3:99-cr-00066-FDW-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 8, 2008). dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?